Model reference · open weights
llm-jp-4 is an open-weight language model from llm-jp. llm-jp-4-8b-instruct (BF16) weighs 17.2 GB; the smallest configuration that runs it is 2× RTX 3060 12 GB.
For self-hosting, compare this build's requirements below with the GPU you plan to rent.
Summary of the llm-jp/llm-jp-4-8b-instruct model card, 2026-10-01
What it is
| Released by | llm-jp |
|---|---|
| Released | 2026-03-30 |
| Parameters | 8.6B |
| VRAM | 17.2 GB for the weights |
What it runs on
| Card | Requests at once | Context max | Memory | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8K each | 32K each | |||
| RTX 3060 12 GB … RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 2 smaller cards | ||||
| RTX 3090 24 GB | 5 | 1 | 40K | 23.4 GB |
| RTX 4090 24 GB | 4 | 1 | 39K | 23.4 GB |
| RTX 5090 32 GB | 12 | 3 | all 64K | 31.0 GB |
| L40S 48 GB | 24 | 6 | all 64K | 44.0 GB |
| A100 80 GB | 56 | 14 | all 64K | 78.2 GB |
| H100 80 GB | 51 | 12 | all 64K | 78.1 GB |
| RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 96 GB | 66 | 16 | all 64K | 93.8 GB |
| DGX Spark (GB10) 128 GB unified | 78 | 19 | all 64K | 107 GB |
| H200 141 GB | 107 | 26 | all 64K | 138 GB |
| B200 180 GB | 142 | 35 | all 64K | 176 GB |
| 2× RTX 3060 12 GB tensor parallel | 4 | 1 | 32K | 11.6 GB a card |
| 2× RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB tensor parallel | 11 | 2 | all 64K | 15.4 GB a card |
| 2× RTX 4090 24 GB tensor parallel | 25 | 6 | all 64K | 23.4 GB a card |
| 2× RTX 3090 24 GB tensor parallel | 26 | 6 | all 64K | 23.4 GB a card |
| Requests at once | 8K tokens each | 32K tokens each |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 19.1 GB | 22.3 GB |
| 5 | 23.4 GB | 39.5 GB |
| 8 | 26.6 GB | 52.4 GB |
| 16 | 35.2 GB | 86.7 GB |
| 32 | 52.4 GB | 155 GB |
| 64 | 86.7 GB | 293 GB |
One card, with vLLM's small-card settings.
From the model card
LLM-jp-4 is a series of large language models developed by the Research and Development Center for Large Language Models at the National Institute of Informatics.
This repository provides the llm-jp-4-8b-instruct For an overview of the LLM-jp-4 models across different parameter sizes, please refer to:
Base models are trained with pre-training and mid-training only. Post-trained models are aligned using supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and direct preference optimization (DPO), without reinforcement learning.
[!NOTE] While the thinking variants are trained with both SFT and DPO, this instruct model is trained using SFT only, without DPO.
For practical usage examples and detailed instructions on how to use the models, please also refer to our cookbook.
To support the continued development of LLM-jp, we would greatly appreciate it if you could share how you utilize LLM-jp outcomes via the survey form.
Please refer to our cookbook for practical usage examples and detailed instructions on how to use the models.
Dense model:
| Params | Layers | Hidden size | Heads | Context length | Embedding parameters | Non-embedding parameters | Total parameters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8B | 32 | 4,096 | 32 | 65,536 | 805,306,368 | 7,784,894,464 | 8,590,200,832 |
MoE model:
| Params | Layers | Hidden size | Heads | Routed Experts | Activated Experts | Context length | Embedding parameters | Non-embedding parameters | Activated parameters | Total parameters |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32B-A3B | 32 | 2,560 | 40 | 128 | 8 | 65,536 | 503,316,480 | 31,635,712,512 | 3,827,476,992 | 32,139,028,992 |
The tokenizer of this model is based on huggingface/tokenizers Unigram byte-fallback model.
The vocabulary entries were converted from llm-jp-tokenizer v4.0.
Please refer to README.md of llm-jp-tokenizer for details on the vocabulary construction procedure (the pure SentencePiece training does not reproduce our vocabulary).
[!NOTE] The chat template of this model is designed to be compatible with the OpenAI Harmony response format. However, the tokenizer differs from the one assumed by the
openai-harmonylibrary, and therefore direct tokenization withopenai-harmonyis not supported. For correct behavior, please use the tokenizer provided with this model. For detailed usage, please refer to our cookbook.
This model is trained through a multi-stage pipeline consisting of pre-training and mid-training phases, using a total of 11.7T tokens.
The corpora used for pre-training and mid-training are publicly available at the following links:
[!NOTE] Although most of the corpora have been released, some portions are excluded from public release due to licensing constraints.
We have fine-tuned the pre-trained checkpoint using SFT and further aligned it with DPO.
The datasets used for post-training are also publicly available at the following links:
We evaluated the model on a variety of tasks using an LLM-as-a-Judge framework. The descriptions of each task are as follows.
We evaluated the models using gpt-5.4-2026-03-05.
[!NOTE] Note: In earlier evaluations of the llm-jp-3 series, we used
gpt-4o-2024-08-06. The newer evaluatorgpt-5.4-2026-03-05provides a stricter and more reliable assessment, which results in lower scores on benchmarks such as MT-Bench compared to those reported for the llm-jp-3 series.
The scores represent the average values obtained from three rounds of inference and evaluation. For more details, please refer to the codes.
| Model Name | MT-Bench (JA) | MT-Bench (EN) | AnswerCarefully | llm-jp-instructions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| gpt-4o-2024-08-06 | 7.29 | 7.69 | 4.00 | 4.07 |
| gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 (reasoning_effort = low) | 8.87 | 8.76 | 4.38 | 4.79 |
| gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 (reasoning_effort = medium) | 8.87 | 8.89 | 4.43 | 4.82 |
| gpt-5.4-2026-03-05 (reasoning_effort = high) |
Quoted from the model card on Hugging Face. The full card is behind the Hugging Face link above.